Enlightenment rationalism and romantic irrationality are
pitted against each other early and often in Shelly’s Frankenstein. As stated,
beginning with Victor’s character and his desire to break the rules of nature
by finding the key to life and death (Enlightenment thought process) against the
immorality that Victor’s creation brings.
Shelly’s writing and Victor’s personality as its portrayed
throughout the novel suggest that perhaps Shelly questioned the ideals and
irrational thinking that Romanticism brought along. With the creation of the
monster comes the question of why one should respect the mystery of life and
death as a romantic surely would.
While Victor’s character takes, for the most part, a
rational and enlightened stand, the monster he creates is quite the opposite.
The monster at the conclusion of the novel goes out of his way emotionally to
state that despite Victor’s death he so desperately coveted, that he has “nothing
left to live for without my creator,” (Shelly 300). In addition, romantic
aspects in the monster’s character and actions include his desperate pleading
for a companion as well as his murdering of Victor’s brother and wife.
Culturally, the monster and the idea of rivaling Romantic
and Enlightenment principles our important in our pop culture era because an
event as far fetched as the creation of the monster may not be so irrational at
all. As modern day technology expands, once unchallenged societal views are
poised to be changed and redefined each day.
Great job, Parker! I agree with your point completely on our modern day technology expanding and how this makes Frankenstein still relevant. These things are now possible, which makes this character so important to our culture. Also, I agree with your ideas that Victor reflects Enlightenment views and The Monster Romantic. I like how you talked about these two ideas as rivaling in the novel. Great job!
ReplyDelete